![]() Workplace
PREVENTION RESEARCH
Employee Assistance Programs: Fact Sheet |
Definition
An employee assistance program (EAP) is a
worksite-based program designed to assist in the identification and
resolution of productivity problems associated with employees impaired by
personal concerns, including, but not limited to, health, marital, family,
financial, alcohol, drug, legal, emotional, stress, or other personal
concerns that may adversely affect employee job performance. (1) An effective EAP should include: • Expert consultation for
employees and managers; National
Association
The EAP Association (EAPA), founded in
1971, is the largest, oldest, and most respected professional association
for persons in the employee assistance program field. EAPA represents
more than 7,000 individuals and organizations around the globe with an
interest in employee assistance. (1) Descriptive
Facts
• 33% of all nonpublic work sites have
assistance programs, serving more than 55% of all employees in • In 1991, a national survey indicated that
45% of full-time employees had access to an EAP provided by their
employer. (2) • Worksite size is related to the
prevalence of EAP programs; 21% of the smallest firms (50-99 employees) have
an EAP, and 76% of the largest firms (1,000+ employees) have an
EAP. (2) • The prevalence of EAPs is highest in
communications, utilities, and transportation, at about 52%, whereas mining,
construction, and service industries have the lowest prevalence, at about
25%. The higher rate among the former may be due to Federal regulations for
drug testing and education. (2) • There are two kinds of EAPs. An
internal EAP is an in-house service, staffed by company employees. An
external EAP is a specialty service provider hired by the employer.
Internal EAPs tend to be more costly than external EAPs, but are sometimes
preferred by employers because services can be more precisely tailored to the
employers' needs. (2) • A
survey of Workplace drug abuse programs found that about 47% were internal
and 40% were externally contracted services. (4) • The median annual EAP cost per eligible
employee, which varied by region of the country, was $21.83 for internal
programs and $18.09 for external programs in a select sample study. (5) • Marijuana and cocaine were the drugs most
often reported as utilized by EAP clients. (4) A 1994 report described anecdotal
evidence of the savings from EAPs: • a $7,750 saving per
employee at Warner Corporation because of lower recruitment and training
costs, lower workers' compensation costs, and fewer on-the-job accidents; • Cost-effectiveness data
on EAPs generally indicate a savings to investment ratio ranging from 1.5:1
to 15:1. A study of the McDonnell Douglas EAP estimated savings of $5.1
million, due to fewer days missed from work, lower turnover, and lower
medical claims of employees, spouses, and dependents. (2) • It was found that drug abuse cases make
up an estimated 10% of all EAP cases, with cocaine being the most prevalent
substance of abuse, followed by marijuana. In contrast, alcohol cases make up
about 20% of the reporting EAPs' caseloads. (7) • The EAP drug abuse caseload is greater in
companies that are stable in the size of their labor force; are economically
stable or profitable; are unionized; have a drug screening policy and
program; believe they have a major problem with drug abuse; refer drug cases
to the EAP; and publicize the EAP, encouraging self-referrals for substance
abuse problems. (7) • Improvement of supervisor training is
positively associated with the proportion of drug abuse cases in the EAP
caseload, and it is negatively associated with the number of EAP staff.
(7) References 1. Employee Assistance Professionals
Association (http://www.eap-association.com). October 1998. 2. Blum, T.C.; and Roman, P.M. (1995).
Cost-effectiveness and preventive implications of Employee Assistance
Programs. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration;
Publication RP0907. 3. Steele, P.D. (1995). Worker
assistance programs and labor process: Emergence and development of the Employee
Assistance Model. The Journal of Drug Issues 25(2):423-450. 4. Backer, T. (1991). Drug abuse services
and EAPs: Preliminary report on a national study. National Institute on Drug
Abuse, Abuse, Drug Abuse Services Research Series No. 1: Background Papers on
Drug Abuse Financing and Services Research. 5. Hartwell, T.D.; Steele, P.; French, M.T.;
Porter, F.J.; Rodman, N.F.; and Zarkin, G.A. (1996). Aiding troubled
employees: The prevalence, cost, and characteristics of Employee Assistance
Programs in the 6. Marsh and McLennan Companies. (1994). The
economics of Drug-Free Workplace programs, N.P. 7. Roman, P.M. (1991). The use of
EAPs in dealing with drug abuse in the Workplace. National Institute on Drug
Abuse, Abuse, Drug Abuse Services Research Series No. 1: Background Papers on
Drug Abuse Financing and Services Research. (3/99) |